The AI Conundrum in Academia
The advent of AI technology, particularly natural language processing tools like ChatGPT, has brought both opportunities and challenges to academic settings. Dr. Sarah Berry, an assistant professor of English at the University of Dallas, and Dr. Christi Ivers, an associate professor of Spanish, share their insights on the impact of AI on academic work and the importance of maintaining human connectedness in education.
Understanding AI in Academic Contexts
When asked about their understanding of AI in reference to academic work, both professors highlighted the prevalence of natural language processing tools. Dr. Berry noted that while there are various AI applications for data analysis and pattern identification, students primarily encounter AI through tools like ChatGPT. Dr. Ivers, with her experience as a language teacher, observed that the challenge of dealing with AI in education has been ongoing for about 15 to 20 years, dating back to the emergence of machine translators.
The Rise of AI-Assisted Cheating
Both professors have experienced an increase in AI-assisted cheating among students. Dr. Berry reported a significant rise in plagiarism cases over the past two to three years, with the number of incidents multiplying by about five times. She expressed concern about the qualitative difference AI-assisted cheating brings, making it harder to grade and engage with student writing authentically. Dr. Ivers echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the breach of trust that occurs when students use AI to complete assignments, which affects her relationship with them and creates a sense of discomfort in the classroom.
Mixed Messages and Confusion
The professors noted that different instructors have varying policies regarding AI use, creating confusion among students. Some classes encourage the use of AI, while others strictly prohibit it. This inconsistency makes it challenging for students, especially freshmen, to navigate the complex landscape of AI use in academia.
The Importance of Human Skill and Intentionality
Dr. Berry drew a distinction between technology and devices, explaining that true technology requires skill and knowledge to augment human capability. She argued that while AI can be a powerful tool when used with disciplinary training, first-year students often use it as a shortcut rather than a means to enhance their skills. Dr. Ivers stressed the importance of intentionality in learning and the need for students to develop discipline in their academic work.
The Value of Uncertainty and Human Connection
Both professors highlighted the value of uncertainty and the process of working through challenges in the learning process. Dr. Ivers emphasized that AI circumvents the crucial process of writing being inextricably linked to thought. She believes that institutions like the University of Dallas can help students appreciate the value of lingering in uncertainty and developing resilience through the writing process.
The Future of Education and AI
The professors discussed the potential long-term implications of relying on AI for academic tasks. Dr. Berry suggested that the mark of a college-educated person in the future might be their ability to think and respond in real-time without AI assistance. Dr. Ivers emphasized that while AI has its uses in certain fields like science and mathematics, it should not replace human thought and writing in language and literature education.
Consequences and Support
The professors also touched on the serious consequences students might face when caught using AI for cheating, including psychological ramifications and academic penalties. They stressed the importance of deterring such behavior rather than simply prosecuting it, as it can make them better teachers by prompting a reevaluation of their teaching methods.
Advice for Students
Dr. Ivers recommended that students utilize resources like Optimal Work to understand their learning processes and manage their time effectively. Dr. Berry advised students to submit any work they have done, even if incomplete, as a gesture of good faith. She emphasized that showing effort and thought, even if the work is not perfect, is preferable to submitting nothing or work done by someone else.
