The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), the nation’s primary railroad agency, has initiated discussions with the Boring Company, a tunneling firm established by entrepreneur Elon Musk, regarding its potential involvement in the Frederick Douglass Tunnel program. This ambitious project is a crucial component of Amtrak’s infrastructure, connecting Baltimore to Washington and Virginia.
The FRA officials have been in talks with Boring Company employees to evaluate the costs and progress of the tunnel program, which has seen its estimated costs escalate from an initial $6 billion to a potential $8.5 billion. According to sources familiar with the discussions, the Boring Company has suggested that it could identify methods to construct the tunnel more efficiently and at a lower cost.
A meeting was held last month between Department of Transportation officials, who oversee the FRA, and Boring Company employees. The Department of Transportation spokesman, Nathaniel Sizemore, confirmed that the Boring Company is among several firms being considered for a new engineering contract. He emphasized that no decisions have been made regarding bids and that standard procedures for contracting and subcontracting will be followed.
The development has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest involving Elon Musk, who serves as a top adviser to President Trump while leading multiple companies, including Tesla and SpaceX. Musk’s role in the Department of Government Efficiency, which has resulted in job cuts and resource reductions at federal agencies regulating his businesses, has further complicated the situation.
Project Background
The Frederick Douglass Tunnel program is a significant infrastructure project aimed at enhancing Amtrak’s capacity between Baltimore, Washington, and Virginia. The project’s cost escalation has brought attention to the need for innovative and cost-effective construction methods.
Implications of Boring Company’s Involvement
The potential involvement of the Boring Company, known for its innovative tunneling technologies, could have significant implications for the project’s cost and timeline. While the discussions are ongoing, the final decision regarding the contract remains pending.
